Context
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in strife-torn Manipur risks disenfranchising thousands. In a state fractured by ethnic conflict and mass displacement, executing an intensive voter roll revision without adequate safeguards for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) threatens to institutionalize political exclusion.
Context: The Special Intensive Revision (SIR)
- The Process: The ECI carries out the SIR to keep voters informed about updates, eliminate dead/deupiled names and add names of citizens who are now eligible to vote.
- State Execution: The process in Manipur is done by the block-level officers (BLOs) who collect forms door to door.
- The Goal: The Official Purpose is to keep the electoral rolls accurate and maintain electoral process integrity.
The Crisis: Disproportionality Deletions
- Draft Electoral Roll: After the enumeration process, the Electoral Commission of India (ECI) released the draft electoral roll for Manipur. The statistics indicate a substantial proportion of which were not collected.
- Hill vs. Valley Discrepancy: The hill areas, primarily inhabited by the Kuki-Zo and Naga communities, recorded a disproportionately high number of deletions and uncollected enumeration forms compared to the Meitei-dominated Imphal Valley.
- The Core Issue: The unequal data collection undermines equitable political representation. In the next elections, it threatens to silence the marginalised groups for good.
Why the SIR Risks Pathways to Exclusion
- Disenfranchisement of IDPs: More than 50,000 IDPs are still living in relief camps or have left the state as a result of heightened ethnic violence. Displaced citizens are no longer able to access their home, official documents. If there is no dedicated and flexible enumeration mechanism these IDPs are effectively barred from the electoral list.
- Administrative and Social Bias: The civil society organization, especially the Kuki Inpi Manipur (KIM) and Indigenous Tribal Leaders’ Forum (ITLF) has raised concerns. They are worried about this exercise potentially reinforcing the divisions created by ethnic violence.
- Lack of Conducive Ground Realities: verification is carried out door-to-door in an intensive manner which demands freedom of movement and normal administration. This top-down process can institutionalize unequal access to the vote in a state that lacks democratic machinery, has a broken social fabric and divided territories.
The Way Forward
- Special Mechanisms for IDPs: The ECI should establish special voting facilities and simplified documentation camps in and around relief zones.
- The Claims and Objections Period: It is an important period of protection. The ECI should be proactive in publicizing this window to make sure genuine voters who did not get their forms at the door-to-door can exercise their constitutional right.
- Transparency and Consensus: The ECI should establish trust among all ethnic groups. While the state is restoring civic normalcy, the dangers of doing an election-related exercise are that it could exacerbate the psychological and political divide between the State and its people.
Source: The Hindu
.png)
