SC Mandates Uniform Compassionate Release Policy

Context

Supreme Court of India has issued instructions to all the States and Union Territories to prepare and announce a detailed and uniform policy to release old age and terminally ill prisoners in three months. The historic judgment, which was delivered on July 16, 2026, by a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) led by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), consists of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta. 

Context and Legal Background

• The judgment came after the PIL had been filed by NALSA in May 2025, raising grave issues of human rights. It said that the occupancy rate of the prisons in India was a staggering 131% and their capacity was hamstrung due to the lack of specialist medical attention for vulnerable, aging and dying inmates.
• The Apex Court in absence of a standard national guidelines exercised its special powers under Article 142 (complete justice) along with Article 32. The bench affirmed that the State has the power to punish, but that punishment should not be meted out in a way to become retribution or a cruel and unconstitutional experience.

Core Constitutional Philosophy

The decision confirms that imprisonment infringes on “freedom of the body” but does not strip a person of his “constitutional personality.” It is based on two essential rights:

• Article 21 (Right to Life and Dignity): The guarantees of humane treatment and a dignified existence extend to inmates. It is a unnecessary suffering of the incarcerated, or the sick, when they are confined to their beds for long periods of time.
• Article 14 (Right to Equality): It makes the granting of liberty a more rational exercise of executive discretion and guarantees uniformity of treatment for similarly situated prisoners in different states.

Key Directives Issued by the Supreme Court

The Court put forward a roadmap for prison administration reform that the Court ruled to be enforceable:

• Essential: All States and UTs have to inform of a compassionate release mechanism in 3 months.
• Standardization of “Terminal Illness”: The policy should utilize the United Nations office on drugs and crime handbook which defines terminal illness as an irreversible, degenerative process that results in death.
• Independent medical boards: Independent medical boards to be formed at divisional and state level to issue non-arbitrary health certificates objectively.
• Integration with UTRCs: Undertrial Review Committees (UTRCs) must systematically monitor cases of physical incapacitation rather than leaving the process dependent on individual applications.
• e-Prisons Portal Digitalisation: The evaluation chain should be recorded on the e-Prisons portal, with the use of automated alerts to avoid delays in the bureaucracy.

Judicial Restraint and Separation of Powers

The Supreme Court made an effort to keep activist intervention in check but also honored the principle of Separation of Powers. While recognizing that administration of prisons is a State subject under the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, the Court said that orders issued by judges would not replace the statutory provisions. Hence, it provided states with flexibility to appropriately adapt the template that NALSA had provided to match the administrative context in their respective states.

Significance for Prison Reforms.

• Move towards Reformative Justice: The order moves the Indian criminal justice system from retributive to humane and reformative justice.
• De-congestion of Jails: Systematically releasing incapacitated inmates alleviates infrastructural stress on overcrowded prisons.
• Post Release Welfare: The order specifies that community health and social welfare departments should be coordinated, and so prisoners are not left behind.

Way Forward

State governments will have to ensure full compliance by submitting accountability affidavits within six months in order to turn this judgment into reality. The Ministry of Home Affairs and MeitY should assist in local jail administration in the form of digital infrastructure, in a seamless manner. In the end it is important to maintain public safety and to eliminate administrative delays that affect the dignity of the human person. 

Source: The Hindu

UPSC Mains Practice Question 

Q. Discuss the significance of the Supreme Court’s mandate for a uniform compassionate release policy in ensuring equality before law and protecting prisoners’ rights under the Indian Constitution.

Download as PDF