Meghalaya’s Mine Closure Policy Gap

Context

Meghalaya still lacks a proper mine closure policy over a decade after the National Green Tribunal banned hazardous rat-hole coal mining in April 2014. The interim reports of the Justice B.P. Katakey Committee have recently come out, pointing to thousands of abandoned, uncovered nuts with serious safety and environmental concerns, including approximately 60,000 in East Jaintia Hills alone. 

Context and Background

• The 2014 Ban: The National Green Tribunal banned rat-hole mining because of unscientific operations, lack of worker safety and the deep acid mine drainage of local rivers such as Kopili. 
• Partial Relaxation: Later, the Supreme Court had allowed the removal and sale of pre-mined coal provided that every measure was taken for the compliance of the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. 
• Illegality persists: Even though there is judicial control, the extraction of minerals is often informal and illegal, with regular fatal mine explosions and accidents. 

Key Issues Highlighted

• Uncovered Pits: Tens of thousands of dangerous abandoned mine shafts remain open and unfenced.
• Delayed Action: Most districts failed to turn in specific proposals for mining closures to the Mining and Geology Department in a timely fashion.
• Unused Funds: Higher restoration amounts have not been used because of administrative delays.
• Continuing Risk: No definitive closure and remediation plan exists, putting humans and animals at risk of accidental falls. 

Structural Bottlenecks

• Sixth Schedule Autonomy: Autonomous District Councils and local tribal communities hold proprietary rights over land and underlying private minerals, complicating unified state intervention. 
• Three-Dimensional Mapping Deficit: Most administration monitoring is carried out on a two-dimensional basis, which is inadequate for complex under-hillside hazards. 
• Livelihood Reliance: poor quality coal seams and limited economic opportunities push communities and informal migrant miners back into dangerous production. 

Environmental and Humanitarian Crises

• Ecological Degradation: Excessive pits are responsible for excessive deforestation, soil erosion and abundant acid mine drainage of toxic heavy metals. 
• Human Rights Violations: Informal workers and migrants do not have safety gears, and are exposed to extreme risks of sudden flooding, collapses and suffocation. 

Way Forward

• Implement Closure Framework: Promote closure options at district level and require scientific closure plans to be developed with judicial oversight.
• Immediate Mitigation: Take high-impact, low-tech measures, such as fencing off dangerous open pits to prevent accidental casualties.
• Sustainable Diversification: Formal economic alternatives and technology-supported legal mining structures to redirect dependence on rudimentary mining. 

Source: The Hindu

UPSC  Practice Question 

Q. Unscientific mining and inadequate mine-closure practices pose serious environmental and socio-economic challenges in mineral-rich regions of India. Discuss with special reference to Meghalaya.

Download as PDF