Image Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto
Context
India’s cancer strategy must transition from symptom-driven tertiary care to structured early detection, as over 70% of patients currently present at advanced stages, driving catastrophic household expenditures and poor survival gaps.
The Current Landscape: Crisis of Late Diagnosis
- Survival Disparities: The five-year survival rate of lung cancer remains low at about 4% in India, compared to nearly 33% in countries that have a robust system of screening (like Japan).
- Low Screening Rates: Although policies have been heavily focused, the rate of functional cancer screening is still very low. But only one in five women in the UK and one in six in the US gets screened for breast cancer, and just one in ten women for cervical cancer, compared to only 1.9% of eligible women in India.
- Data Blind Spots: Cancer is not a notifiable disease for the whole of India. Official data are biased toward urban populations because only 10% to 16% of the population is registered in existing registries, which are only population-based or hospital-based.
- The Youth Shift: Colorectal cancer in India is affecting a younger population, with almost one in three (29%) patients being under the age of 50.
Gender and Socio-Cultural Barriers
- Gender-Driven Delay: Women often overlook early signs because of family responsibilities, lack of control over their body and societal norms or modesty issues related to breast or pelvic examinations.
- Risk Denial in Men: Masculine norms and risk denial cause men to dismiss early signs of tobacco and/or alcohol use (e.g., lesions of mouth, esophagus, etc.) until later in life.
- Urban-Rural Divides: Access continues to be biased towards advanced tertiary centres in major cities, with a heavy reliance on reporting late for symptoms in rural areas.
Policy and Structural Imperatives
- Upstream Shift: The need to change the investment focus in healthcare from costly tertiary infrastructure to the integration of primary care screening is called Upstream Shift.
- Systematic screening protocols: Common malignancies (breast, cervical, oral, and prostate) – move from passive awareness campaigns to systematic, age-appropriate testing protocols.
- Enabling Frontline Workers: Upskilling Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) and primary health clinicians to use their routine, community engagement to effectively conduct early symptom triage.
Existing Government Frameworks
- NP-NCD: The National Programme for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases (launched in 2010 as NPCDCS) mandates opportunistic screening for common oral, breast, and cervical malignancies via grassroots health facilities.
- Ayushman Bharat (AB-HWCs): Frontline Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres are trained to conduct localized screening of the population, for citizens aged 30 and above.
- National Cancer Grid (NCG): Launched in 2012, this large network ensures that more than 280 cancer centers and research institutions share their experience and expertise, and a successful standardization of treatment paths has been achieved for more than 60% of all national oncology cases.
Way Forward for India’s Public Health Architecture
- Decentralized Diagnostics: Roll out mobile diagnostics stations and make use of digital health technologies such as telemedicine and digital pathology to overcome rural-urban divides.
- Culturally Tailored Campaigns: Design public health messages that actively challenge social stigma and address gender-specific barriers to early screening.
- Strengthened Research Funding: Give research a push to strengthen indigenous research for environmental and genetic risk factors for India optimising cost effective local screening protocols.
Conclusion
Late-stage cancer undermines national productivity and contributes to the fallacy of poorer families into inter-generational poverty. Implementing a shift in the healthcare system from symptom chasing to early detection is a critical economic and moral need to realize SDG Target 3.4.
Source: The Hindu
.png)
