Double Engine: Federal Fairness Test

Context

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) popularized the Double Engine slogan, which literally means a coordinated form of governance, with both the Union and states being dominated by the same party. It is offering expedited growth, by way of policy coordination, allocation of resources, and administrative unanimity. It is a catchy question that begs deeper questions upon the federalism in India that is enshrined in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, the relations between Centre and the State where the balance between cooperation and autonomy prevails. Opposition ruled states have complained of favoritism in devolution of funds in recent debates that have highlighted whether this model is based on political obedience at the expense of constitutional fairness.

Historical Context of Centre-State Dynamics

The federal system of India was developed as a result of unit leadership by the Congress (1950s-1960s) to assertiveness in the coalition period after 1967. Sarkaria (1983) and Punchhi (2010) commissions had suggested cooperative federalism with focus to fiscal federalism through awards of the Finance Commissions.

• Pre-2014 Era: Party rule was uniform and friction was decreased, however, the Emergency (1975) and liberalization that occurred after 1990s brought to the fore tensions.
• Post-2014 Shift: BJP has gained to form a double engine in 19 states by 2024, which can be associated with the schemes such as the accelerated implementation of PM Awas Yojana.

This is a reversion to Nehru era centralism, but using modern instruments such as GST council to collaborate.

Understanding the “Double Engine” Narrative

The slogan of the double engines implies that having the same political party in the Union and States level will lessen the political friction, and the political rate of development can be increased.

• Cooperative Federalism vs. Political Alignment: Although coordination between government is optimal the slogan proposes political homogeneity.
• Implication on Federalism: The storyline presents a possibility of under-development or non-supportive centre to non-aligned (opposition-ruled) states, which makes it difficult to have the federal compact of all states as equal.

Threats to Federal Balance

This story raises huge questions about the constitutional system of India.

• Unequal Treatment: It leads to the creation of an incentive to develop fear that central projects, investment, and funds are more available to aligned states.
• Erosion of Autonomy: It coerces the states to conform politically in order to develop, undermining regional autonomy and a wide range of political decisions.
• Weakening Democracy: It turns the constitutional provision of equal federal partnership to a transactional carrier of development based on the election results.

Way Forward: Restoring Constitutional Fairness

In order to protect federal balance:

• Institutional Reforms: Free Insulated Fiscal Council to give open devolution; Governor appointments through collegium which has time limitations.
• Improve the Role of Finance Commission: 16 th FC (2026+) needs to implement formulaic grants, audited yearly.
• Political Bipartisanship: Resurrect Inter-State Council meetings; incentivize performance as opposed to alignment in schemes.
• Judicial Oversight: Article 263 implementation through Supreme Court interventions (e.g., 2024 Kerala case).

Conclusion: Beyond Slogans to Equity

The efficiency offered in ‘Double Engine’ is at the expense of the federal asymmetry in violation of the equality of Article 14. The only way to be truly progressive is to be just, not to be on track- making states flourish regardless of colour of leadership. Federalism is the bottom line as India continues to seek to become Viksit Bharat by a year 2047.

Source: The Hindu

Download as PDF